|
[Home] [Video&Photos] [Ludicrous] [Software] |
November 22nd 2009: Although I have noted that a reply has been made to my hummingbird post on the Liberty Basic community forum, I have not read it and I am not going to either, and am not going to reply to it either: My reason for this is very simple: When I say "Over and out!" I MEAN "Over and out!" - Whatever it is other headlines appearing nearby; seemingly provoking or urging the same person who replied, clearly reveals it as obviously just one more of Fifi's (chanalized through the people who made the ad hoc profiles) arranged "dogfights", and I cannot be drawn into it. Neither can I allow myself to be lured or provoked* into any kind of discussion which would imply endulging into further research that I am not expecting to earn money, or in any other way profit from, myself, just because those who make ad hoc profiles are making insinuations or provocations. If I give in to such provocation atempts in this case then how about the next time, and the next time again? Enough is enough. I already said "over and out" and that's it. I shall not be fooled into working on conditions similar to those of a slave or an animal! Regarding the remark about certain apparent threats made against a lady of my former acquaintance that refer to a topic headline that briefly showed up almost immediately after I had posted the hummingbird-thread, but which was quickly removed after I added the remark. Though I'm gonna leave the remark so as to dismantle any potential similar future atempts. *(The method referred to may be illustrated by the following analogy: "Give me a hundred bucks or I'm gonna insinuate something nasty about you!" - "I'm not gonna give you a hundred bucks. Especially if you don't ask nicely." - "Dang... I don't think you have the guts to give me a hundred bucks, now show yourself like a man and give me a hundred bucks!" - "I'm not gonna give you a hundred bucks just because you try to provoke me!" - "What are you a chicken?! Now give me a hundred bucks!" - I'm not gonna give you a hundred bucks! - "Bok bok bok bok bok!!!" - "I'm still not gonna give you a hundred bucks!" - "Dang again! - Well then I have WON and have the taunting right until you prove yourself better than me by giving me a hundred bucks!" - Ok. Condolences on the "victory" then. But I'm still not gonna give you a hundred bucks.) Primo November 2009: I was working on a graphics application to help out with particular sides of image editing which I discovered that the other graphics applications I have does not implement quite as flexibly as I needed*. However , I found that knowhow on a discovery of potential financial value I made awhile back**, other than that which I had shared voluntarily had been leaked (seemingly deliberately***) to the general public on the Liberty Basic Community forum. (Though of course in a broader context the act of human deliberation in this case still is not incompatible with viewing it as just another example or variation of Fifi's "hundredth monkey" info-"sharing". -In response of course I immediately dropped the whole project and deleted the application and all the source code! -I do not include screenshots this time, though, so that others can't be inspired from it. The Quonquerah and Slideshow screenshots should quite sufficiently demonstrate my programming skills to contradict those who atempted to make it appear otherwise. - So I just conclude - again - that Fifi's (ie. paranormal) activities has, as they have in effect functioned as what comes down to industrial espionage, once again served as an example to remind me not to work on anything at all, so that I won't happen to discover-, or conceive of anything new that could have otherwise been of any potential value, interest, or entertainment at all, to anyone or anything, as long as I can't expect to profit from it myself. I, Rasmus Palbo Nielsen may give or share voluntarily that which I, Rasmus Palbo Nielsen choose to give or share voluntarily. Other than that:  (Long piece of steel wire to the bike frames and stunt double is grounded!) Regarding what I can do: I can be well prepared to commit suicide, as failing a suicide atempt due to lack of knowledge of how to effectively kill myself could be both painful and result in lasting damage. -Cheers! (And if God wants to know where his son is: I definately just saw those people who make ad-hoc profiles took him. As far as I can tell I think they broke his neck. They're talking about launching nukes, you know.) *November 15th: As early as today I was sitting with a gif that I needed to change in a certain way that would have been very easy and straight foreward if I'd had the here mentioned application. Though I wasn't sure it would even be possible with any of the graphics applications I have. As it turned out it could be done, though only after some haphazard experimentation. As I said; using the application that I deleted it would have been a very straight foreward thing to do. **Namely in connection with the "Analog Desktop Chronometer" application that I posted on my other website; NoDeal! Productions (Really it don't seem to matter now anyways, since the activities of the fighting fanatic morons who seem to have been following me around on the internet; creating ad-hoc profiles to try any way they could to provoke me and others against each other, have effectively managed to spoil the sanctuary and platform of selling my software that I had hoped the NoDeal! Productions website could have been). ***The details of the plundering, more specifically, are these facts: Following my deleting the sourcecode of the ADC application a post emerged; asking if it was possible to recreate the sourcecode from the compiled program (which fortunately it isn't). Shortly after there appeared at least one other post expressed in a generally rude tone, uttering - obviously deliberately and very clearly - interest in misc. rather suspiciously seeming topics; one of them specifically asking how to circumvene a built-in copyright-statement of an application created by a respected senior forum member. (I asume that after the question about recreating sourcecode they must have realized that they could not disguise their intention of stripping ADC of anything they could get, and were trying to appear as if they were some kind of "accomplices" of mine; aiming at (as they were apparently attempting to give the impression of) boosting my reputation on the forum, by contrasting my deliberately polite (as I need to be when assholes are consequently trying to make me look bad) way of querrying knowhow. -Or perhaps they were trying to give the impression that it was I who were making the ad hoc profiles, myself). Later, the querry about "semi-transparent sprites" there arrived not long after my mentioning of "semi-transparent bubbles" in connection with the slideshow application on this page (do notice the identical spelling; with the dash: In my understanding that use of the dash-sign is not at all as widespread among native english/american language users as it is in danish): The initial claim of the person posting that thread was rather nonsensical, as he started out pretending to already know how to make the effect; claiming that he had some "semi-transparent pixels" (?! - that's actually nonsense; ain't no such thing) that just didn't look very well. But it's not till later in the thread (Reply #2 on: Jul 5th, 2009) that he start testing different mask colors - so why would he - Jul 4th, 2009 - have claimed to already have a "semi-transparent" sprite if he didn't discover the technique before Jul 5th, 2009?! - If he wanted to know about a technique I used in my SW that I hadn't shared info about then he could have asked and chances are I'd have shared the knowhow with him voluntarily, in stead of pretending to already know so as to avoid giving credit, apparently. I think I shared some pretty useful routines freely! So what the heck is up with the apparent urge to steal?! Seemingly just for the sake of stealing, or sucking me dry to as far an extent as they anyhow could. That tendency seem to have been reoccuring. Another motive could be to necesitate me to explicitly state my connection to the NoDeal! Productions website, to confirm it as a target of the cyberbullies. Though, since I had to publish the deghoster and a handful of routines it was propably not very hard to guess, which is why I had to quit the donation-button with the email option it implied. So by now there's no point in bothering with working on anything at that domain at all. It's been compromized, targeted.. The NoDeal! Productions website; although remaining, as it must, my primary statement, is no longer a project in development. -As for semitransparent sprites all I have left to do about it is poison that topic so that others can't use it - and abstain from researching it myself, too, as it might otherwise be claimed (perhaps more or less filosofically justifiably) if I worked on it myself, that I would then; by thus taking a kind of monopoly, have 'stolen' the technique from the community pool of potential knowledge, or something like that. In reply to the apparent request to translate the "Dialog" appear to aim at also asociating "Neo Christians" (akin to the "Neo Spiritualists" in the "Dialog"), with whome they were therefor atempting to afiliate themselves (not only the user profile in question at the LB forum, but also via a Facebook profile who made an atempt at me about the same time) with the bioweapon tekst in my name that for awhile flourished on the web - and was in fact not removed from the web, but quite the contrary found its way it to some arab language website (at that time obviously atempting to get arab decendents asociated with it). Seconcly: the forum topic "Put animation on main screen?" which was raised to top-of-list: Don't believe in any apparent atempt at (making it appear as if I'm) threatening a certain lady of my former acquaintance with a certain animated .gif mentioned here: FYI I deleted that gif long ago shortly after our conversation! So don't believe in anything they atempt to make appear. It's all provocations and atempts to stir up people against each other. With regard to the whole case of destroying my stuff and ruining things for me, and the whole sentiment that seemed to be associated with it, I can't help but make a note of the fact that the middle name of the prosecutor of the case against me is also the common danish expression of the special pleasure of someone else's misfortune. - Though, see in the context of the harassment campaign as such, also my comment of September 7th 2010 to img.31 - And as for the method of provocation: Do you think that when Erwin publically insinuated about someone "an iq of a hundred and fifty", whereas in the same situation (as mentioned on the index page) said about another person that he "had never been too bright" that that might be a deliberate tactique to provoke the latter - and everybody who might identify with him - against the first? And btw: It's NOT the Liberty Basic Community Forum which is supper: It's the friends and family of the person who suggested that it is who are supper! And if you set a man on fire (such as by luring people into winking the eye at him) and keep him warm; in return of which you make claim of the rest of his life, then obviously that which you make claim of is the rest of that life the rest of which is the agony of burning to death! (And then I go and spoil it all by saying something like: It is NOT a declaration of love unless it is informed, voluntary, and explicit!) And it is that person who suggest that "failing to prepare is preparing to fail" who is preparing to fail whatever he is failing to prepare. |