Download a full copy of this website:
Regardless of what you call your political system.
I Can't Begin To Describe...
How pleased I am to finally have gotten my stalker for a decade smoked out in the open. My first encounter with him was on my very first web page, about a decade ago; an msn group. This was right after that incident of the you-know-what-"debate" that I'm sure a whole lot of people remember only all too well... (such as eg. how "Uncle E" back then orchestrated the verbal gangrape and what in effect comes down to sociopsychological sterilization of at least one then completely innocent young boy that I know of.. Though of course the new discovery of the "Jonas" profile's role as an agent provocateur obviously puts things in a new and quite different and interesting perspective... A coherent picture of what actually might have happened back then now really seems like it could be starting to take shape.. Let me enjoy this word a little longer: Agent provocateur... Hmm..). I didn't have it for long though, because someone soon joined in with two ad hoc profiles. One which was called "Jonas" and another that I don't remember the name of any longer. Obviously the same person though, using two profiles to fill my msn group with a pretend-discussion to drown out all my own writings on it.Later on I learned from others who had had connection with the environment too, that they had apparently also had trouble with someone calling himself Jonas (Can't help but wonder now, who provoked the original trouble there back then..) He was the first person I ever heard using the hair colour trick, by the way. But back then I didn't know about that. Next time I encountered the trick with the ad-hoc profiles was in connection with the "Weird Sims" page: Someone (whose identity I now begin to get a more specific idea of) had obviously been using their influence to stir up trouble around me. For example by that pretend-spam on another group of which I was a co-admin at the time making false claims about who is whose husband and wife.. (I'm guessing in the deliberate atempt to pin James against me... And it appear to have worked; as is evident from his reaction on the Sims2 site that set off the whole situation over there) So I was naturally becomming aware.. Then suddenly someone registered no less than five diferent member profiles on the same day. And given that my group otherwise got only about one new member per day you don't have to be Einstein to figure out it was another case of ad hoc profiles preparing to flood my forum. Though of course at that time I had no specific idea of who it might be...
Third time was the incident on dating.dk. Again the trick with the ad hoc profiles, and again aiming rather obviously (to pretty much anybody there) at spoiling things for me and generally undermine any sensible discussion in there.. Then the "Prolly" ad hoc profile suddenly showed up, making conceiled references to the old you-know-what debate, and atempting to "encourage" me to use specific tricks... And will you imagine: Having a bit of an ear for the finer nuances of language; the distinctly recognizable verbal "style" of the "Prolly" profile, as the same as that of the old "Jonas" ad-hoc profile all those years ago..
Now, just the other day, I found a website who'd posted a scan of an old magazine in which there was a letter from me that I'd written when I was a teenage pothead, and which (therefor) is a bit embaressing. Nothing bad or anything, just a bit embaressing. Also knowing how some people might be expected to (atempt to) use that kind of thing. So I asked the guy - kindly - if he would please remove at least my name from the scan. (He'd be wise to remember that anyone can lookup his name just as easily as they can mine). He replied that it surely wasn't his intention "to expose anyone" and that he would get to it "soon".. And otherwise did nothing about it.. After a couple of days when still nothing'd happened I decided to check him out... And will you know what I found.. The old website of his of his; apparently dedicated to exactly that: exposing just about anyone caught his momentary interest... Not that I don't use exposure as a weapon too.. But I don't use it against completely random people for no better reason that I don't like the way they look or the music they like or the clothes they wear, or things like that.
-And what's more: Faintly recognizable traces of the self same verbal style as the "Prolly" profile from dating.dk and the "Jonas" ad-hoc profile from the old msn group (same choise of topic from back then too - I am of course in particular referring here to the phrasing of a certain tirade about people who can't 'recognize genuine originality when they see it' which was practically identical)... Now, to begin with I wasn't entirely sure.. But as ill disguized threats or "suggestions" apparently referring to specific named persons suddenly emerged on his new site, I knew I had the right guy.(Speaking of which: Don't trust the photo he's provided on the new site (whome ever can he possibly be intending to target with that photo?). Another source provides a different one).. Another source provides a different one).. 'Must admit I wasn't sure if he'd fall for the robot voodoo thing.. But he appeared to insist on that frame of reference of having "ownership" of others, so I made the bet that he actually believed in it himself... And there he is, out in the open at last... GOTCHA!
Now.. I am no saint. A man's gotta do what a man's gotta do. And if that has to include retaliating then that's what. If someone makes a problem with me I have a problem with him or her. If someone makes a problem with my offspring then I have a problem with his or her offspring. If someone makes a problem with mine I have a problem with his... But what I under normal circumstances do NOT do is chase people around, making anonymous provocations under cover of ad hoc profiles, or make war on others for no good reason other than that they look different, or belong to some general population group, or being fans of the wrong football club or whatever. Though admitted: when you spike a guys drink you may get him to do stupid things, and I too may not always be aware of possible alternative interpretations of what I've written.
But in such cases I'd make sure to remove it again a.s.a.p. so it don't do more harm than it need to... Unless, of course, others with a possible interest in exposing others to that harm, or in stirring up the trouble, or whatever, choose to bring it back in the open. Though A.V.E (as well as possibly other "hobby" provocateurs) are well adviced to remember that his old writings, just as well as mine, might well show up "in the interest of documentation", as he epressed it himself... So the question, now that I have removed some unintentionally, apparently stepped on A.V.E's personal toes, due to a name-mixup; is then: is he gonna return the show of good faith by removing the references he put up or what?!
Why should I make a problem with some general fragment of the population? (and don't even think of twisting my words on this: I'm sure you could make some kind of "fragment" out of just about anything.. But you know what I mean). I'm sure that some of the individuals in any given population group are mostly nice and decent people while others of the same population fragment are often behaving like assholes. Regardless of how they look or what political party they vote for or what religion they have.
And I'm not one second in doubt that the old HK-memorial site could be atempted used as some kind of atempt to dress me up as something else.. I have made no secret of the fact that that site existed... In fact I am proud of it. It was a good site: It worked exactly like it was supposed to (until "Jonas et al" got it shut down): Namely by creating awareness of a particular problem without becomming a haven for racists and provocateurs with no better agenda than to stir up trouble. The reason why I don't make an issue out of that topic on this site is that I don't want to give my persecutors an excuse to get the wrong group blamed for their dirtywork.
And sure one might have examples of questionable methods, or at least what might be presented as such.. A guy has to defend himself etc. But there's still a difference between doing what you gotta and taking your frustrations out on whome ever might come in handy. And I might not be completely immune to manipulation atempts. But at least I try to figure out more specifically who's behind something before go off blaming arbitrary segments of the general population or stalking complete strangers who happen to have read something I don't like or wear the wrong clothes or look the wrong way. - Oh, and now that I'm at it, btw.. My apologies to anyone I might have acused wrongly. Not that I expect it to matter much, but hey; anyways.
Oct. 7th 2007